1. The case involving loans, etc. between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, etc. 2010 Ghana 16594 dated July 13, 2010.

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. The Plaintiff’s judicial claim for the interruption of extinctive prescription of the claim established upon the completion of conciliation of the instant case, including loans, etc., from 2010Kadan16594, July 13, 2010, which the Plaintiff filed against Defendant B, for the claim against the Defendant B.

(b) Judgment made by deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant C is obligated to pay the agreed amount of 10 million won and damages for delay pursuant to the above agreement, since the defendant C agreed to pay the obligation based on the loan, etc. of 2010's group 16594, which is the husband of the above agreement. Thus, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the existence of the above agreement only with the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 3 and 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's allegation in this part is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified, and the claim against the defendant C is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.