1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 4, 2017 to September 13, 2017.

1. 사실관계 [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 1∽11호증의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지 C과 원고는 1983. 12. 8. 혼인신고, 그들 사이에 1남 1녀 원고는 2006. 8.경 자녀들과 캐나다로 출국 후 미국 영주권을 취득하여 현재까지 미국에 거주하고 있고, C은 한국에 거주하고 있으며, 본건 부정행위에 불구하고 이혼절차가 진행된 바 없다

A claim for damages arising from divorce, including a claim against a third party, falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of a family court as a case of family litigation of Category C prescribed in Article 2(1)1 (c) (ii) of the Family Litigation Act, including a claim against a third party (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Da10104, May 16, 2014). C has sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff at a golf range around March 2016 while travelling along with the Plaintiff, and was laundry, and was given a Kakakao Stockholm message. 2. A third party related to the occurrence and scope of liability for damages does not interfere with the essence of marriage, such as interfering with a couple’s communal life by interfering with the maintenance of common life falling under the essence of marriage by having a third party commit an unlawful act, and thus infringing on the spouse’s right as the spouse, thereby including an unlawful act as a matter of principle, it constitutes a tort (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2017Meu98.