The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On October 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) registered a notice to the effect that the victim C sells the direct trade crowdfunding box in the Internet NAVV bulletin board for KRW 220,00,00; and (b) made the phone call to the victim to purchase the said box in KRW 2.50,00,000; and (c) made a false statement to request delivery to the victim under the Seoul Special Metropolitan City D log B2.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he received the above spread.

The Defendant was delivered by the victim at home on October 22, 199.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. In light of the fact that the witness E calls to the victim C while using the Defendant’s mobile phone in this court, and the victim C was also a resident registration certificate photograph of the Kakakaox, which was transmitted by the other party in the above transaction (the resident registration number part is tobacco), etc., it is difficult to deem that there was no reasonable doubt as to the fact that the Defendant committed fraud as stated in the above facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

3. According to the conclusion of the judgment, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of a crime, a not-guilty verdict under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be pronounced, but since the defendant cannot obtain the consent of the defendant due to his/her absence on the sentencing date, the public announcement of acquittal judgment