The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Even when taking into account the fact that the Defendant is deeply against the instant crime, the Defendant appears to be adequate in the economic situation, and the damage is minor, the Defendant again committed the attempted crimes of this case even though he had been already punished several times for the same kind of crime, and committed the attempted crimes of this case again in the judgment of the court below, even though he was ordered to suspend the execution, and again committed each of the instant crimes again after one month from the date on which the sentence became final and conclusive, and thus, it is inevitable to punish the Defendant significantly.

In addition, considering all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unlimited and it is deemed unfair. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.