The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment, confiscation, and additional collection) of the lower court's punishment is too unreasonable.

2. In our criminal litigation law, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the direct principle, where there exists a unique area of the first deliberation on sentencing, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the first instance sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it even in the appellate court (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The Defendant recognized the instant crime.

However, the defendant was punished for a crime related to marijuana, and the crime of this case was committed during the suspension period of the execution of the same kind of drug crime.

The defendant is a co-defendant of the original trial in his pro-friendly B, beyond merely administering or possessing phiphonephones.

It is also possible to deliver a philophone to the people.

At the court below, the defendant had the above B perjury, followed the crime of this case to B, and tried to avoid liability.

There is no change in the circumstances that may change the punishment of the court below in the trial.

When comprehensively considering the above circumstances and the sentencing conditions, such as character, conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be unfair because it goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.