1. Defendant C’s each of the KRW 1,000,000 and each of them to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties, from March 15, 2017.

1. The facts following the facts of recognition do not conflict between the Plaintiff, Defendant B and D, and the Plaintiff and Defendant C may be acknowledged by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as a whole between the Plaintiff and the Defendant C.

Plaintiff A, E, and Plaintiff H and I, on February 20, 2016, got their respective marriage types on the part of Mawa Holdings L in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon (hereinafter “instant Dong Holdings”); Plaintiff H and K on February 27, 2016; Plaintiff J and K on January 9, 2016; Plaintiff F and G on February 28, 2016.

B. The plaintiffs entered into the contract for the use of each wedding hall and each wedding hall, and each of the above contracts included that the plaintiffs received the images and photographs of the wedding hall.

(A) It is difficult to specify the amount of time for marriage-style photographing because the principal and principal type photographing is comprehensively stated in the contract.

Defendant C was a person operating the instant database. On February 29, 2016, Defendant C discontinued the instant database, and the Plaintiffs did not receive images and photographs from Defendant C.

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims

A. The Plaintiffs asserted that the claim against Defendant C is liable to pay the amount claimed as consolation money, since they did not receive the images and photographs of the marriage-based filming due to the nonperformance of obligation by C, which is the operator of the instant wa referred to in the instant wash.

The defendant C is also obligated to pay consolation money for mental distress suffered by the plaintiffs since it is acknowledged in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiffs were unable to recover from the compensation for property damage because they did not receive the images and photographs of a marriage type from the defendant C, and the defendant C was also aware of such circumstances.

However, the amount is about KRW 2 million, including all the plaintiffs’ “rithic photo, dice-use, merck-type and principal food (Marriage type), photo, drick-use, and merck-type.”