logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.07.24 2013고단2503
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On September 23, 2005, at around 00:50 on September 23, 2005, the Defendant’s employee A, with respect to the Defendant’s duties, loaded freight of more than 3.9 meters exceeding 2.5 meters in width on the 4 line of the national highway located in Gyeongcheon-do, Gyeongcheon-do, Gyeongcheon-do, Gyeongcheon-do, the Gyeongcheon-do, the Defendant’s employees violated the restriction on the operation of the

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005, and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008) which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case was declared as unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court Order No. 2008HunGa17 of Jul. 30, 2009, and accordingly, the above provision of the Act retroactively lost its effect.

3. As the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and a summary of the judgment of the Defendant is publicly announced pursuant to Article 58

arrow