1. The Defendants indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 as “Defendant jointly and severally liable” are jointly and severally identical to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff delegated the instant aggregate extraction site (hereinafter “the instant aggregate extraction site”) to the elderly group’s direct management of seven districts (K, L, M, N, N, O, P, and Q) located in the Nakdong River located in the Nakdong River, a national river, and the elderly group operated the instant aggregate extraction site by setting the permitted quantity and the permitted period for aggregate extraction. The elderly group operated the instant aggregate extraction site by setting the aggregate extraction business entity.

B. Defendant A, C, D, E, and I are the police assigned for special guard working at the aggregate extraction site of this case, and Defendants B, F, G, H, and J are the employees of indefinite contract who work at the aggregate extraction site of this case, and one police assigned for special guard and one life contract worker as two employees per month, while performing duties such as guard, removal of aggregate from office, etc.

C. From April 2007 to March 2010, the Defendants released aggregate without permission in collusion with aggregate extraction business entities to manipulate records on aggregate removal. Accordingly, Defendant A was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and a fine of 19.2 million won; Defendant B was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and a fine of 12 million won; Defendant C was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and a fine of 18 million won; Defendant D was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and a fine of 18 million; Defendant D was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and a fine of 7.2 million won; Defendant F was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months; Defendant D was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and a fine of 10.3 million won; Defendant G was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six years and a fine of 16.2 million won and a fine of 3 million won for two years and six years and six years, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3 (in the case of vegetable evidence, including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of the claim