logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.09.10 2015고단503
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B’s imprisonment for eight months, Defendant C’s imprisonment for ten months, and Defendant D for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant D, on November 14, 2013, sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act from the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on November 14, 2013, was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on June 20, 2014, which became final and conclusive on June 20, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendants and I’s fraud

A. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport’s structure of fraud of lending money for house leasing is operating a system of lending money for house leasing at a rate lower than the market interest rate if an application for a loan is filed with only certain documents such as a certificate of employment, statement of salary, etc. without any special security to stabilize the housing of homeless workers, and a charter contract.

The crime of fraud of lending money on a deposit basis for a false house is a structure in which a loan broker, a loan broker composed of a loan broker’s total liability and a lessee recruitment liability, etc., and a false lessee submits only relevant documents in office and a loan broker to a financial institution entrusted with the business of lending money on a deposit basis with the financial institution entrusted with the business of lending money on a deposit basis through a formal examination. First of all, the loan brokers falsely recruited loan broker to recruit loan holders who will apply for a loan on a deposit basis and actually work for the lender, and then prepares false documents such as a certificate of employment, a statement of payment, etc. under the name of a disguised company as if the lender actually worked as an employee and has regular income. As such, as if a false lease contract was actually concluded between a false lessee and a lessor, a false lease brok and a false lessee

B. Defendant D’s crime committed by the Defendants extended loans to Defendant A at least KRW 37 million with the lessee of the lease agreement.

arrow