The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the fact that the Defendant reflects the Defendant, and that the Defendant recovered and agreed on damage, the sentence of the lower court (a fine of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant shows the appearance of the judgment against the defendant, the full amount of the damage at the investigation stage, and there are no criminal records of the same kind.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant on the ground that he was absent from the election of the Vice-Speaker as a member of the U.S., thereby damaging two parts of the U.S. and two office fixtures in that place, etc., and thereby damaging public goods. As a member of the local council, it should be seen that he left the election of the Vice-Speaker through legitimate procedures and taken away from the election of the Vice-Speaker, but the Speaker of the Gu Council would have an attitude of unsatisfying it. However, the crime of this case was damaged due to the failure of the motive of the crime, and the crime was damaged due to the failure of the motive of the crime, and the crime was not good. In full view of all the circumstances that are the conditions of the sentencing of this case as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is judged to be proper, and it is not reasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.