A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 00:02 on April 1, 2017, the Defendant reported that “C Library “C Library”, Defendant D, who was on the frontway, f, was satisfing, and sent to the site, confirmed the case to D, and, without any justifiable reason, confirmed the case to D, the Defendant’s left head at the right hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Service log of the police box E and the service log of 112 reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of a damaged police officer's photograph of a damaged police officer;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (from June to one year and six months) [Special Sentencing Decision] [Judgment of sentence]: The defendant exercised violence against a police officer who properly performs his/her official duties; the fact that the nature of the crime is not good; the circumstances favorable to the fact that there is the history of punishment for the same kind of crime: The recognition of the crime and reflects the motive and background of the crime; the means of the crime; the circumstances after the crime; etc.; and the various conditions of punishment as indicated in the theory of records and changes.