1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, except for the addition of the judgment as to the allegations raised by the Defendants in the trial of the court of first instance, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.In addition, the following judgments shall be added to the second and fifth of the judgment of the first instance.

“A recording tape or a recording recorded by a stenography cannot be concluded to have no admissibility of evidence solely on the grounds that the recording tape or a recording recorded by the tape is recorded on the other party’s confidential information among the other party’s lands under the Civil Procedure Act, which adopts the records of recording and the principle of free evaluation of evidence. Whether such recording tape or recording is admissible shall belong to the discretion of the fact-finding court, and even in the case where the person who raised a documentary evidence on the land does not prove the establishment thereof in particular, the court may recognize such recording by free evaluation without resorting to other evidence (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Da37138, Sept. 10, 2009), the time and time of conversation, the method of recording, the method of recording, the method of recording, and the method of recording, and all other circumstances recognized by the overall purport of pleadings.”

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and all appeals by the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.