A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 6 million for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving), etc. in support of the Sungnam-gu Friwon method, and on July 20, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving) in support of the Nriwon Friwon method, and on July 20, 2015.

1. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant was driving a vehicle B K5 vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.083% from the 3km section of 3km from the uppermost road in the direction of a member of Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, from the upper road in front of the Mansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, to the upper school in front of the Hasan-si, an elementary school in the Hasan-dong, a member of Ansan-si.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving BK5 cars.

The Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol at the time of the day set forth in paragraph 1, and proceeded to turn to the left at a speed of 30 km per hour from the 21st century hospital room to the Seoul Blue-dong Hospital.

Since the location is where signal, etc. is installed, the driver has the duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely in accordance with the traffic signals while checking whether there is a vehicle that drives along the intersection by reducing the speed for the driver and by checking well the front side of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left while violating and proceeding the signal while the signal was red, received the part on the right side side of the victim C(52 tax) driving of the Madle-5 taxi driving, which was carried out directly from the left side of the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim with salt and tension in the areas where she is in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment, she is deemed to have been in need of converging, she is in need of any other treatment