1. The defendant is liable to the plaintiff on August 8, 1980 for the registration office of the Seoul Northern District Court with respect to the size of 136 square meters on a road B in Jung-gu, Seoul.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the land survey division prepared during the Japanese occupation of the Defendant with respect to the registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the Defendant with respect to B, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the registration of ownership in the name of the Defendant, etc., 1) the land survey division consisting of 2,233 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment

B) On May 1913, 1913, E, who had an address in the Sungsung (Seoul metropolitan area) was entered into the circumstances of E. (2) The instant land was divided into the G Yang-gun, the G 876 square meters, the G 336 square meters, and H 1,021, and the cadastral record and the register were destroyed.

3) Afterwards, the G 336 square meters (hereinafter “the mother land of this case”) of the instant assessment land in the name of F 876 square meters and H 1,021 square meters under the name of Japan, Yang-gun-gun G 336 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment”).

(4) On August 8, 1980, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the Defendant as Seoul Northern District Court’s receipt No. 54317 on August 8, 1980, as to the mother land of this case (the lot number was changed to Dongdaemun-gu Seoul).

5) Thereafter, in the case’s mother land of this case, K 74 square meters and B 136 square meters and B 136 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(6) The land category of the instant land was changed to “road” on February 28, 2007.

B. The Plaintiff’s inheritance relationship 1) L died on November 16, 1945, and M was solely inherited L’s property, its principal, and M was killed on April 6, 1949, and N’s principal, who was his/her death, solely inherited M’s property.

3) N died on November 15, 2012, and the Plaintiff,O, and P, who were their children, succeeded to N’s property. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 9 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. In light of the following circumstances, the assessment title of the instant land, the instant land is presumed to have become final and conclusive due to the Plaintiff’s prior L, which is the Plaintiff. The registration of preservation of ownership in the Defendant’s name as to the instant land is null and void.