A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the "E" that carries on the wholesale and retail business of computers and Software in the Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, 306, and no one may issue or receive a tax invoice without supplying or being supplied goods or services.

1. On June 30, 2014, the Defendant issued a false tax invoice: (a) as if the Defendant supplied the products to the above E office without having supplied the products with “E”, “E”, “NYS”, “NYS”, and “66 million won”; and (b) issued four false electronic tax invoices including the total supply price of KRW 610,100,000,000 from around that time to December 29, 2014; (c) around February 30, 2014; (d) around June 30, 2014, there were no false tax invoices to receive KRW 610,000,000,000 in total; (d) around 2, 2014, there was no fact that the Defendant received the products from the E office with “E”, “ENS”, “F”, “NYY”, and (e) up to 250,014, the supply price of the products from “Y 24,” to 2014,5000.4,”.4,”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A H statement;

1. Report on investigation results;

1. A written accusation;

1. Details of transactions of suspect corporation accounts, application of each tax invoice statute;

1. Article 10 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are issued or received falsely.