logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.06.12 2014고단2770
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.: (a) discovered that C was living together with the victim D (at the age of 55) that he had previously returned to the Defendant; and (b) caused the victim and C to have

On October 22, 2013, the Defendant sent text messages to the cell phone used by the victim using his own mobile phone (E) at an insular place (hereinafter “C”) and then sent text messages “C equally and now Fucom is flap death and death (hereinafter omitted)” from the time to November 19, 2013, and sent text messages at least 84 times as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Table from November 20:29 to November 20, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant has repeatedly reached the victim's text that arouses fear or apprehension.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) found the “G main store” operated by the victim D (the 55 years old) located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F around October 2013. Around the same day, the Defendant requested Da and his friendly arrest H, and the victim’s refusal to carry tin together with the tebbb, but the Defendant was dismissed, and the Defendant followed the beer’s disease on the table, which had been on the table, left the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object, and acted as if he would inflict any danger and injury on the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

3. The Defendant interfered with business, at the location described in Paragraph 2, 2-3 days after the date specified in Paragraph 2, re-explosived with three female members of the Defendant’s pro-friendly feasia and the victim D (n, 55 years old) with three members of the Defendant’s pro-friendly feasia, and “I do not have the business here, but I do not have the business here.” The Defendant, in turn, went beyond the table of the table and the chair in that place, went together with the dispute and became the customers who were in the place.

This is the defendant.

arrow