logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.02.03 2015고정437
하수도법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of a building (a total floor area of 125.52 square meters) located in Daegu-gun Co., Ltd.

When the head of Gun recognizes that a private sewage treatment facility is installed, operated, or managed in a manner that fails to meet the standards for effluent water quality, he/she may issue an order to the owner or manager to improve the facility within a specified period, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and the owner or manager thereof shall comply with

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not comply with the fourth improvement order of the personal sewage treatment facilities from the number of finites on July 3, 2014 to September 1, 2014 on the ground that he/she discharged wastewater exceeding the standards for the water quality of discharged water with respect to the above building, but did not comply with the order even though he/she received five improvement orders of the personal sewage treatment facilities from the number of finites to December 22, 2014 from October 23, 2014 to December 22, 2014 for the same reason.

Defendant 2, “2015 High 778,” even though he/she received an six improvement order for personal sewage treatment facilities from January 11, 2015 to March 10, 2015, on the ground that he/she discharged wastewater exceeding the standards for effluent water quality with respect to the above building, he/she did not comply with such order.

In addition, the Defendant failed to comply with the above improvement order despite the issuance of the 7th improvement order for the personal sewage treatment facilities from April 2, 2015 to June 1, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 High 437"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of each police officer against the accused;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. Results of on-site inspections by this court;

1. Each sewage test report;

1. Public correspondence of an administrative disposition for the fourth and fifth improvement orders;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Each accusation shall be 2015 high class 778;

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police officer against the defendant.

arrow