Text
1. All the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of this case shall be dismissed.
2. Of the costs of lawsuit, the part resulting from the principal lawsuit.
Reasons
1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to exist;
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the motor vehicle A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the motor vehicle B (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
B. On July 2, 2008, when the accident and bodily injury C driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle and opened the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the vicinity of the front northwest-gun, the Defendant was not found to have the Defendant’s vehicle of the D driver’s vehicle, which is the road right to the direction of the course at the intersection where there is no signal prior to the new signal in the front of the new signal in the direction of the direction of the direction of the course of the course, and it was shocked by the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in front of the left part of the Defendant’s vehicle.
E, who was on board the plaintiff's vehicle due to the accident above, suffered injuries, such as sama, etc., and F, such as climatic salt, etc.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
On March 22, 2012, E, the main victim of the instant accident, such as E litigation and agreement, filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking damages of KRW 2,872,029,344 in the sum of the Seoul Central District Court 2012Da71075 case, and the Plaintiff agreed with E to pay the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 1,332,623,364 in the said lawsuit by integrating the results of physical appraisal of E.
E The Plaintiff received the said money from the Plaintiff, and then withdrawn the said lawsuit on February 19, 2013.
(E) As between March 18, 2009 and March 22, 2013, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 181,409,300 in the name of the Plaintiff related to the injury of E during the instant accident as the amount of reimbursement for the said insurance proceeds.
(1) On the other hand, the plaintiff paid 20,582,90 won in total to F who had another passenger of the plaintiff's vehicle to the defendant under the name of medical expenses and agreement, and the amount of indemnity corresponding to the ratio of negligence of the defendant vehicle to the defendant.