All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The above-mentioned sentence of the prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine the defendant's and prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing together with the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing. This case is a case in which the defendant has committed the crime of this case from October 2013 to June 2014 by stealing another person's name, including relatives and scars, etc. over a long-term period of 10 times and has forged or used public documents or attempted to acquire loans from financial institutions by forging or using private documents about 20 times and by using them. In light of the law, frequency, circumstance, etc. of the crime, the defendant's crime is considerably poor; the defendant's crime of this case is committed once with punishment for the same crime, one suspended sentence, and one criminal punishment once after the suspended sentence had been imposed; the defendant's child seems to have committed the crime of this case in a somewhat insufficient psychological condition; the defendant's normal condition and age, personality and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, circumstance, etc. favorable to the defendant's child, and the defendant and prosecutor's allegation that this case's aforementioned punishment is unreasonable or acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.