Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2018, the Defendant’s execution officer B affiliated with Suwon District Court, which was entrusted to the creditor, with the execution of the KCABC, and by the decision of seizure of corporeal movables in Seoul Southern District Court No. 2017Gaso481912, the Defendant seized objects equivalent to KRW 1070,000 at the market price of the corporeal movables owned by the Defendant and displayed the seizure, despite the fact that the Defendant’s seizure was made on January 3, 2019, at the place of storage of the seized objects in D apartment E, which is a creditor, and the public official without permission, abandoned the seized objects to another person or concealed them in connection with his/her duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of auction of corporeal movables, the general content of the case under progress of the Seoul Southern District Court 2017 a.a., the general content of the case, the attachment report of corporeal movables, the list of seizure and the protocol of

1. Relevant Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order can not be deemed excessive fines for a summary order in light of not only half of the seizure list, but also the fact that it constitutes a war, etc., which is a major item, in the subject of compulsory execution of corporeal movables, and considerable hindrance to judicial procedures concerning compulsory execution.