1. On November 13, 2013, the Defendant’s revocation of revocation of the request for dismissal between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff is serving as C University (hereinafter referred to as “C University”) operated by the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “ Intervenor”) as a tourism English and assistant professor.

B. The Intervenor’s sexual harassment investigation committee, which received a civil petition of the Plaintiff’s sexual harassment, conducted a self-inspection from June 18, 2013 to June 25, 2013. On June 26, 2013, the CJ president requested the president of the Intervenor to take a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff, along with the above investigation report, etc.

C. On June 28, 2013, the Intervenor held a board of directors on June 28, 2013 and resolved that the Intervenor’s teachers’ disciplinary committee constituted D, E, F, G, and H.

On July 4, 2013, the president of the Intervenor, upon receipt of the above disciplinary proposal, appointed I as a fact-finding officer on July 4, 2013, and requested I to conduct a fact-finding on the above disciplinary proposal for six days from July 5, 2013 to July 10, 2013, and requested the Intervenor’s teachers’ disciplinary committee to make a disciplinary resolution against the Plaintiff on July 19, 2013, and notified the Plaintiff of the reasons for the above disciplinary resolution on the same day.

E. On July 23, 2013, the Intervenor’s teachers’ disciplinary committee held a first meeting on July 23, 2013 and decided to appoint F as a fact-finding officer, and F requires F to investigate the truth-finding and negligence of duties of the Plaintiff’s sexual speech and behavior and negligence of duties from July 24, 2013 to July 29, 2013. On July 30, 2013, the Intervenor held the second meeting to review the report on the fact-finding report prepared by F. On July 30, 2013. After hearing the Plaintiff’s statement at the third meeting, the Intervenor decided to dismiss the Plaintiff as one removal and four removal marks out of the five marks in total.

The specific grounds for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant grounds for disciplinary action”) are as follows.

1. Speech and behavior of sexual harassment;

A. On April 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) around Lbbybya (1) Lbbya; (b) Labyain English among the curriculum curriculum, and (c) to J, a male student in the first-year class regardless of the curriculum.