A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 2, 2016, the Defendant and B, together with the Defendant, paid the amount of alcoholic beverages B after drinking two female amusement reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception

The defendant paid the alcohol price to the above entertainment receptionist 7 times even though the above entertainment receptionist her service hours had reached the above 7 times, and it was difficult for the victim to bring him a disturbance over about 10 minutes per hour and 10 minutes per hour by repeating the desire to the same purport of the victim and raising him/her to his/her employees and other customers, such as "I am going to her, her, her, her, her, her, her, her, her, her, and her, her, her, her, and her, her, her, her, her, and her, her, her, her, her, and her, her, her.

As above, the Defendant conspired with B to interfere with the victim’s main business by force.

2. At the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, the Defendant’s sole criminal conduct, as seen above, destroyed the table table of the room No. 7, and then destroyed the 2.1 million won total of the market price owned by the victim D, by following the table table of the room No. 7.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect of D prepared by the police;

1. A report on internal investigation (limited to attachment of field photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (referring to submission of a written estimate for future business operations);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence, Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act first category (Interference with Business) is to be mitigated (Interference with Business).