beta
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
1. As to the grounds for Defendant A’s appeal, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment convicting Defendant A of the instant facts charged, on the grounds stated in its reasoning.
The judgment below
Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.
In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. As such, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable for Defendant A to be imposed is not a legitimate ground for appeal.
2. Examining the reasoning of Defendant B’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court is justifiable to have found Defendant B guilty of the facts charged in this case (excluding the portion of innocence) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical
3. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant C’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that Defendant C was guilty of this case’s facts charged (excluding the part not guilty of the grounds of appeal) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in
4. The judgment of the court below on the grounds of Defendant D’s appeal.