logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.07.21 2015고단846
중감금등
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On July 26, 2014, the Defendant was detained in Jung-gu Busan on July 26, 201, and around 03:50

D) The victim E, who had not repaid the money before being repaid, was found to have frightened and frightened in the Madern-gu, and was frightened, the victim was frightened to the G office located in Busan Jung-gu, through the gaddar-ro with fright, and the victim was frighted to the G office located in Busan Jung-gu through the gadar-gu, and demanded the entrance fright to lock the correction device and to repay the money, and the victim was detained for about 1 hour and 30 minutes by preventing the victim from leaving the above place until 05:28 of the same day.

”라고 말하며 왼뺨을 오른손으로 2회 때리고, 주먹으로 머리를 여러 차례 때리는 등 피해자에게 가혹한 행위를 하였다.

B. The Defendant forced the victim to pay 2.5 million won of the price of the goods within one week by assaulting or threatening the victim at the above time and place.

“Preparation of a loan certificate to the effect that the victim does not have any obligation to do so to the victim.”

(c)

At the above time and place, the Defendant confirmed the personal information recorded in the loan certificate while the victim was frightened by assault and intimidation, and received the resident registration certificate from the injured party.

2. Taking into account the following factors, the evidence alone submitted by the Prosecutor has sufficiently proven that the facts charged are beyond a reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see it.

① The Defendant denies all of the crimes, and the Defendant asserted relatively consistent with the investigation process from the case to the instant court.

② From among the evidence submitted by the prosecution, the victim E’s statement protocol corresponds to each of the above facts charged. However, E reversed all the statements in the prosecutor’s investigation process, and made a statement in the same content as the defendant’s assertion.

arrow