logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.06.16 2015구합80260
총회결의무효확인 청구
Text

1. Of the plaintiffs' lawsuits, Article 4 (Project Implementation District), among the resolutions on the agenda item of [Attachment 1] Item 1 of [Attachment 1].

Reasons

1. Case history

A. On May 7, 2015, the Defendant Union held an extraordinary general meeting and resolved on the agenda items of paragraph 1 of attached Table 1 as indicated below.

Ten of the members of the agenda under subparagraph 1 in the order of the consent rate resolution, 10 of the members of the 13 agenda under subparagraph 1, 10 of the 3 agenda under subparagraph 2 of the 9, 10 of the members of the 13 agenda under subparagraph 2 of the 10, 10 of the 10 supporting 10 agenda items

B. On August 17, 2015, the Defendant Union held an extraordinary general meeting on August 17, 2015 and resolved on the agenda items in the subparagraphs of attached Table 1 List 2 as indicated below:

(A) Resolution of this case, including the above A and B Resolution, hereinafter collectively referred to as "each Resolution of this case"). Seven members of the 13 agenda item No. 13 among the members of the 13 agenda item No. 1, "3 agenda item No. 2" 3 / 2 / [Grounds for recognition] without any dispute, evidence No. 3-5, and the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Of the resolution on the agenda item No. 1 of August 17, 2015, the Defendant applied for authorization to amend the articles of incorporation to the head of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “head of Gangdong-gu”) on the ground that the Defendant union made a resolution of the general meeting on the agenda item No. 1 (amended by the Regulations of the Association), although the Nonparty applied for authorization to amend the articles of incorporation on the ground that there was no consent of at least 2/3 of the members of the association, the non-party applied for authorization to the head of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “head of the non-party headquarters”), Articles 4, 9, 11, 12, 28, 29, 30 [the selection of a Si construction project and a project implementation contract), and 30 [the imposition and collection of expenses] Articles 30 (3) and 418 (2) (hereinafter referred to as “the above resolution of the general meeting”) without any consent of at least 2/3 of the members.

arrow