Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall allow anyone to repeatedly reach another person with words, etc. creating fear or apprehension through an information and communications network.

Nevertheless, the Defendant demanded that a victim C, who had been a fluence from November 2015 to May 201, 2016, who had been a fluence, deliver to him/her to him/her, and the victim refused it, and the victim refused it on January 22, 2017, and used his/her own mobile phone from an influence place to the cellular phone of the victim, “the name of a single-do” refers to the name of the

Handphones, telephones, and telephones.

If we ignore this letter, I would like to make it clear to Ma. I would like to say that I would like to go to the next day.

It appears to be clear from what person it is or what person it is.

At present, the telephone is called today.

Finally, from around August 7, 2017, including sending the text message, “not later than the time the message was sent,” the message was sent repeatedly or made a phone call with the content that could cause fear or apprehensions to the victim 17 times in total, as set out in the following crime sight table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes of one copy of the text message (the text message, the Kakao Stockholm conversation, and the CCTV screen) submitted by the victim, and of one copy of a separate binding record;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the public trial of this case, such as the fact that the defendant had no record of criminal punishment for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the degree of damage to the victim, and the circumstance of this case, shall be determined by taking into account the sentencing conditions indicated in the public trial of this case.