A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

A person who has received a written notice of enlistment in active service shall enlist within three days from the date of enlistment.

Nevertheless, on May 30, 2014, the Defendant directly received the notice of enlistment in active duty service under the name of the director of the Incheon Gyeonggi-si Military Manpower Office, stating that he will be enlisted in the Army Training Center located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, and that he will be enlisted in the Army Training Center on July 21, 2014, and did not enlist within three days from the date of enlistment without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Domestic registration/explic mail, inquiry of enlistment in active duty service, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the official notice;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion under Article 88 (1) 1 of the relevant Act on criminal facts

1. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion is that the Defendant, who is a witness with friendship, refused to enlist in the army according to his religious conscience. Such conscientious objection constitutes “justifiable cause” under Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act and does not constitute a crime.

2. As to the so-called conscientious objection according to conscience, the Constitutional Court decided that Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act, which is a provision punishing the act of evading enlistment, does not violate the Constitution (see Constitutional Court Order 2008Hun-Ga22, Aug. 30, 201). The Supreme Court does not constitute “justifiable cause” as provided for the exception to punishment under the above provision, and the right that conscientious objectors are exempt from the application of the above provision is not derived from Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which the Republic of Korea is a party, and presented a recommendation by the United Nations Commission on Freedom of Civil and Political Rights.

Even if this does not have any legal binding force, it has been decided that it does not have any legal binding force.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2004Do2965 Decided July 15, 2004, and Supreme Court Decision 2007Do8187 Decided November 29, 2007, etc.). Ultimately, the Supreme Court has decided on July 15, 2007.