Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants, two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, on November 24, 2016, did not get out of a taxi that had arrived at a destination in front of the Gu's apartment house door during Ansan-si around 23:40 on November 24, 2016, and had been called out after receiving a report from a police officer of the police station E zone belonging to E zone in the police station during the safe period of their call-up; Defendant A, upon receiving a report from a police officer of the police station E zone in receipt of a request for returning home from F;

C. The police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by assaulting the F body twice by taking a brush with a shoulder, such as a brush, a brush, a brush, a brush, etc.

Defendant B, on April 4, 2017, sentenced Defendant B to imprisonment with labor for a period of six months as a result of interference with the execution of official duties in the support for the development of Suwon Friwon, which became final and conclusive on April 12, 2017.

[Criminal facts] The Defendants: (a) on March 25, 2017, around 01:40, in front of the H in Manan-gu G in Manan-gu, Mayang-gu; and (b) on March 25, 2017,

In order to listen to the circumstances of this case by finding the Defendants, the police officer of the police station I District of Ansan-gu, and the Defendant B expressed his desire as follows: “I kyping the Defendant’s arms,” “I kyping the Defendant’s arms, I am kying, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am am kyer, I am kyer, I am kyer, I am am kyer, I am on the left side of the above K with the Defendant’s hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to F, J and K;

1. Criminal facts;