A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking), etc. at the Suwon Franchising Board, and two years of probation on September 10, 2008, and was sentenced to a fine of five million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking), etc. at the same court on September 10, 2008. On January 18, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won or more due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (dangerous Death or Injury caused by Transfer of Danger) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking).

1. On January 5, 2016, Defendant 1, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) had been punished twice or more due to the above-mentioned violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and once again, Defendant 2 driven Cick car with alcohol content of about 1km from the 1km section to the front road of the Yongho High School located in the same city in the same city on the same day from January 5, 2016 to around 22:50 of the same day.

2. The Defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the death or injury prior to the risk) and is engaged in driving of a Saturday car as stated in paragraph (1).

On January 5, 2016, at around 22:50, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as indicated in paragraph 1, driven the said earth and car and driven the two-lane road in front of the Yong-ho High School located in the Sinpo-si in the Sinpo-si in the military. On January 5, 2016, the Defendant driven the said earth and car at a speed of about 40km per hour along the length of lifelong learning driving distance.

At the time, there is a crosswalk at which signal lights are installed at night and at the front door, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle with a duty of care to live well in the front door.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving a roadside in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, was negligent in driving by the victim D, who was standing in front of the above crosswalk and was waiting for a signal signal.

E.