1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the third sentence of the judgment of the first instance, the Plaintiff added the following contents to the fifth sentence “Iskic disease” under the 8th sentence of the judgment of the first instance, and added the following contents to the 5th sentence “Iskic.” In the appellate court, the Plaintiff was actively and clearly sponsed by the deceased at the time of receiving the said port’s telephone. The Deceased was a active and obvious nature. The Deceased submitted a written statement of workplace manual fee (a evidence 4-1 to 3) with the content that “Iskicians have been engaged in duties without any problem.” However, even considering this, the Deceased was under difficult stress due to the telephone of the above port.

It is difficult to view that the mother-gymal disease, which is the base disease of the deceased, has rapidly deteriorated beyond natural progress.

On the 9th page of the first instance judgment, the following is added to the following. The deceased appears to have been in a considerable rain. On the result of the health examination of the deceased on December 24, 2014, the exercise and food control were recommended due to blood pressure, blood dyssis, and liver diseases, etc. In addition, the state of the deceased’s ordinary health condition seems to be a factor that may cause or deteriorate blood-related diseases.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.