A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny;

A. On March 24, 2014, at around 15:50, the Defendant discovered DNA cargo vehicles equivalent to KRW 1,000,000 at the market price owned by the victim C, the vehicle key of which is parked, and cut off by driving the vehicle after opening the above vehicle door and driving the vehicle.

B. On March 25, 2014, at around 21:44, the Defendant: (a) laid down one straw in the truckingter’s market price equivalent to KRW 25,000, the victim’s market price, which was the victim’s possession of the above 25,000, that was he accumulated in front of the above string point; (b) around 22:27 on the same day, the Defendant: (c) cut off one strawing cans equivalent to KRW 34,00 at the market price, which is the victim’s possession in the storage of goods at the above 22:27 store; and (d) cut off 34,000 won at the market price or 30,000 won at the market price, or one stick and one stick from the above string vehicle.

2. On March 27, 2014, around 15:20 on March 27, 2014, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime, even though he followed the living room and the scheme to steal cash, etc. in the house, etc. from the victim I’s house located in the Chungcheongnam-gun H, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and opened inside the house, and intrudes the victim’s house into the house, and did not commit an attempted crime on the wind without any money or valuables.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared by J, I, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Circumstances that are favorable to the defendant among concurrent crimes: The facts that there are no records of the same kind of crime, the fact that the seized damaged article appears to be a living offender, the fact that the damaged article was returned and partly restored, which are disadvantageous to the defendant: the attempt was made to larceny accompanied by intrusion upon residence, and the fact that serious reflectivity is insufficient.