Of the instant lawsuits, the part demanding the payment of KRW 675,300 shall be dismissed.

The plaintiff's remainder.

1. The Plaintiff requested that the Defendant pay KRW 675,300 to the cost of demand procedure related to the application for the payment order of this case. However, since the amount paid as the cost of lawsuit can be repaid after the judgment became final and conclusive, there is no benefit of filing a lawsuit separately (see Supreme Court Decision 9Da68577, May 12, 2000). Of the lawsuit of this case, the part demanding the payment of the cost of demand procedure is unlawful and dismissed.

2. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff of the parties is a person engaged in real estate development consulting business under the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant is a company that obtained approval from the Daegu Metropolitan City Mayor on November 29, 2018 for the construction project plan for the newly-built multi-family housing of Daegu Dong-gu D (hereinafter “instant project site”).

B. On June 1, 2015, the Plaintiff in the service contract between the Plaintiff and E on June 1, 2015 (hereinafter “E”) is the Plaintiff Company E (hereinafter “E”) on June 1, 2015.

A) A land purchase services contract, including the following contents, was concluded. A land purchase services contract (project outline 1, 2015) for Fdong-dong land (project outline 1, 2015) in Daegu-gu: 2) site area: approximately 9,099 E (A) and C (B) for a new project site in relation to the new project site in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the contract for the purchase of land for the land for the new project site is concluded as follows in good faith in accordance with the principle of good faith in relation to the construction of the new project site: