The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The Defendant, who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor (one year and six months) of the lower court, is deemed to have a fluor

The appeal was lodged.

If there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). As new sentencing materials are not submitted in the trial at the trial, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court’s judgment, and comprehensively considering the reasons revealed in the proceedings of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing was dismissed and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not appear.

The defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.