logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.10.24 2017고단252
특수상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2017, at the community hall located in Chungcheong City, around 18:30, the Defendant heard that the victim D (68 taxes) whose usual appraisal was not good, drinks with the residents, and divided the conversations with the residents, and “I see that the President of the Senior Citizens’ Council, who was a senior citizen, was playing on the senior citizen’s home,” and “I am a telephone. I see, “I am a gue telephone.”

"After doing so, as mentioned above, the salted fish, which is a dangerous thing that might have been used for living if you were as above, and the victim suffered injuries, such as the victim's face, neck, chest, ear, ear, shoulder, etc. on a multiple occasions due to the salted fish so that the victim suffered injuries, such as a chroned snife, knife, knife, and knife, which require treatment for about 14 days to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, F, and G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written petition of D;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1. A photograph of the parts of the victim's wife attached to the victim D;

1. Photographs of the scene of crime;

1. Each investigation report (the attachment of a medical certificate of injury, the attachment of photographs, the visit and investigation of H, the attachment of site pictures, and the hearing report of victim D phone statement) / The defendant asserts that the injured party only has knifed the victim's face level once due to the wooden fish sniffed, which had been flicking after the defendant's hack, and that the victim did not have been flicked several times.

However, the witness D consistently stated from the investigative agency to this court that “the Defendant has reached the victim several times due to the salted flocked by the Defendant,” and stated to the effect that the witness E, F, and G, who is a witness, also correspond to this alternatively (Provided, That the Defendant appeared that the Defendant was sled by the salted salt but the salted salt was known to the effect that the salted salt is a wooden salt or a downed salted salt, and F, G, while the Defendant did not have been flicked, the victim was flick.

arrow