logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2019.02.19 2018고합140
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the representative of “Co., Ltd.” established for the purpose of purchasing, processing, etc. a house in Indonesia B group. D is the representative of “Co., Ltd. G” established for the purpose of feed import and distribution business with the head office located in the Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E building F of Goyang-si, and H is the representative of “Co., Ltd. J” established for the purpose of processing and selling agricultural and livestock products with the head office located in three floors of Seoul Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

On April 12, 2007, the Defendant: “Around April 12, 2007, 70% of the corporation’s equity shares will be paid to D as a measure to guarantee investment funds in order to distribute the profits from the purchase and processing business of receiving and processing house,” and even if D received an investment of US$ 792,000 from D to January 4, 2008, the Defendant did not entirely transfer its equity shares to D to the measure to guarantee investment funds.

At the end of March 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to H, the representative of “J” corporation in Indonesia, the victim’s “J”, the representative of “J” corporation in Indonesia. Of South Korea, a person doing business in Indonesia, who is not a few persons, but is an agricultural expert, and is a good farmer in the Republic of Indonesia when making an investment. A total of KRW 1 billion is invested, but a total of KRW 1 billion is invested, and a balance of KRW 900 million is paid as down payment in sequence in accordance with the schedule of project payment.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had already been 70% of the corporation’s equity shares to D, the representative of “stock company G”, and had been invested in US$ 792,00,000, so even if he received investment money from the victim, the Defendant had no intent or ability to transfer 53% of the corporation’s equity shares after the receipt of the down payment of KRW 100,000,000 to the victim, and it was impossible to develop guidance

arrow