The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is not attached to the elevator of this case by preparing a letter written in the facts charged by the defendant, but to the elevator of this case by the relative visiting the defendant's house, and it is attached to the front of the victim's house (E), and the content is not false.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the court below's finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged is justified, and there is no error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the defendant, since it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant defames the victim by openly pointing out false facts as stated in the facts charged.

① Prior to the occurrence of the instant case, the Defendant has been punished for disputes and disputes arising from noise between floors with the Fdong residents of the instant apartment including the victim.

② The Defendant recognized that the document (No. 10 pages of the evidence record; hereinafter “L”) was written and attached in front of the instant apartment L site question, and the L/C notice states that “The above house (E) is the same as the husband’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s dial.

③ Lho Notices and comments written in the facts charged of this case (hereinafter “instant notices”) were posted at a similar time, and around that time, there were the same contents as the Defendant’s office mail and the Defendant’s front door.

And from the time of the occurrence of the case, the defendant.