1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 70,835,886 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from May 24, 2017 to the day of complete payment.

The judgment on the cause of the claim is based on the following facts: (a) on March 29, 2017, the Plaintiff: (b) obtained a claim attachment and assignment order (Seoul District Court Decision 2017TTTTTTE 200, 2017, 2017, 200, 200,000 won as title; (c) the original copy of the notarial deed of money loan loan contract No. 928, 2017, 483,930,310 won as title; and (d) on the part of the Defendant from June 30, 2016 to February 28, 2017, 48,000 won as debt attachment and assignment order (the assignment order of this case was issued to the Defendant on April 3, 2017; and (e) the assignment order of this case reached the Defendant on April 3, 2017; and (e) on the part of the Defendant from June 26, 2018, 2017

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total amount of KRW 70,835,886 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from May 24, 2017 to the day of full payment, as claimed by the plaintiff, after the assignment order of this case was delivered to the plaintiff, except in extenuating circumstances.

The Defendant’s argument regarding the Defendant is asserting that, as the Defendant made a verbal agreement to settle the price of the remaining goods at KRW 65 million around March 2017, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay only the total amount of KRW 65 million to the Plaintiff. However, it is insufficient to accept the Plaintiff’s assertion solely with the statement of the evidence No. 1, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.