logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단3301
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On October 21, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and was released on March 30, 201 during the execution of the sentence at the Daegu Detention House on March 28, 201 and the parole period expired on June 28, 201.

[2] The Defendant: (a) operated “I”, which is a food material supplier in the name of H in the Gyeonggi-gu Government; and (b) changed the name of the business entity into “K” in the same place from June 5, 2013 to “K” in the name of J at the same place; and (c) operated the said K substantially.

around July 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract for receiving red powder supply from the “N” operated by the Victim M in the Gyeonggi-do Kimpo-si L, and received a demand for security from M., and the employeeO of the victim “J constructed the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P case as a J Construction Business Operator, and received 201 as a substitute because it did not receive the construction cost, which is offered as security.

“The purpose is to provide the victim with “P building No. 202 also 201,” and “No. 202 is offered as a substitute, and there is a public room value as security” and “No. 202 shall be offered as security against the P building No. 201,” instead of 201, the victim believed that the real estate offered by the defendant is adequate for security value.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, the above 202 was against the actual transaction price of KRW 120 million, and it was already leased to Q on or around January 11, 2013, and Q had no collateral value as a real estate that Q actually resided after the date fixed as the person on February 1, 2013. The Defendant was well aware of this fact, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if Q was supplied with food materials from the injured party because the Defendant had been unable to pay food materials even with other food supply businesses.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and his deceivings the victim on July 2013.

arrow