The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free conviction due to violating logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on defamation (Defamation) and aggravation of concurrent crimes, etc. of the Act on

On the other hand, the argument that Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. is unconstitutional cannot be accepted.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal is permitted for the wrongful grounds for sentencing. Thus, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.