The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant has not driven a vehicle as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the operator of drinking alcohol is currently driving at the present site, ② the operator was called to the site of this case upon receiving a report that “I am under the influence of driving, I am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the jurisdiction of the Defendant at the time of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. Meanwhile, the Defendant asserted that “The above report is inadmissible, since there is no sign signed on the report on the statement on the state-run trial statement (Evidence No. 3).” However, H appeared in the court of the court below and recognized the authenticity of the part of the above report, and the court below adopted only H as evidence among the above report, so the Defendant’s above assertion has no merit.

C. In addition, the Defendant is driving under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant case.