logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.07.13 2018고단1451
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts and subordinate statutes, no person shall borrow or lend any access medium used in electronic financial transactions while receiving, demanding or promising the consideration therefor.

Nevertheless, around December 2017, the Defendant received a proposal from a person who was infinite contact with his/her own mobile phone to "on the face of 3 million won in the face of lending a physical card connected with the passbook and return the physical card after one month." On December 24, 2017, the Defendant sent a physical card connected with the bank account in the name of the Defendant to the public bank account in the name of the Defendant to the article of Kwikset service in the name of the Defendant, at around 17:0 on December 24, 2017.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the access media used in electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the transactions of deposits and withdrawal;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 49(4)2 and 6(3)2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the Selection of Punishment (i.e., the selection of punishment, and the fact that the Defendant’s crime of this case was actually abused as a means to commit the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the phishing, but the circumstances are not good, such as the fact that the Defendant seriously reflects the facts charged, and that the Defendant is the first offender, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow