The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of suspended sentence in October) is too unhutiled and unfair.

2. In a case where the act of assault and intimidation was committed against multiple public officials who perform the same official duties ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor's ex officio, multiple crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties are established according to the number of public officials who perform official duties. In a case where the above act of assault and intimidation was committed in the same opportunity at the same place, and where the act of assault and intimidation was assessed as one act under the concept of society, multiple crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties can

(2) On June 25, 2009, 2009Do3505, Jun. 25, 2009). According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant was arrested and detained as a flagrant offender with the crime of interference with business that interferes with the business of taxi engineers B at a place, and was investigated at the place, and the Defendant expressed a desire to include sexual expression to the police officer, who was engaged in the duties of police box, as a police officer, who was engaged in the duties of police box, and spits the face and work clothes of G, and took a bath to the same effect as the police officer, who was engaged in the duties of police box, and also took a bath to the same effect as the police officer, who was engaged in the duties of police box, and thereby interfered with H’s legitimate performance of duties, and thus, the Defendant’s act of interference with the performance of official duties at the same place as the Defendant’s act of interference with the performance of official duties under the social norms of the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which omitted the defendant's relation to the obstruction of performance of official duties of this case.