logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.22 2016고정465
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Some of the facts charged were revised to the extent that it does not undermine the defendant's right of defense.

The Defendant is a person who was engaged in mechanical parts processing business (B).

Around February 2015, the Defendant: “Around February 2016, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent the Victim C with the processing of parts to conduct a transaction by requesting the processing of parts; (b) provided that “Around February 2015, the Defendant would pay for the processing of parts without any intention or ability to pay the processing costs even if the Victim requested the processing of parts.”

Since then on March 28, 2015, the Defendant paid 3 million won out of 6,499,900 won for processing costs, even after having been supplied with parts processed by the Defendant on March 28, 2015, and did not pay 3,49,000 won for the remainder;

4. 30. Processed Costs 3,100,90

5. 30. Processed Costs 1,012,00 won, supplied

6. 30. Processed Processing Costs 1,650,000

7. 30. 30. The total product processing cost of KRW 10,237,400, including the processing cost of KRW 974,600, which was supplied, was not paid, thereby making a profit equivalent to that amount.

Around 14:00 on January 5, 2015, the Defendant told the victim to pay the price within two months from January 5, 2015 to the victim E management F in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu., that the Defendant would pay the price within two months from January 5, 2015 to the Defendant’s management B.

However, the defendant did not have any particular property at that time, and even if he had been provided with the steel processing service from the injured party, such as overdue payment to the other transaction parties, there was no intention or ability to pay the price within the agreed period.

The Defendant was provided by the injured party with the above processing service equivalent to KRW 708,000 from around that time, and from that time until February 28, 2015, with the victim’s false statement on three occasions as indicated below, the Defendant was provided with steel plates processing service equivalent to KRW 1,274,000 in total supply value.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

[Written List of Crimes] The date and time of crime.

arrow