1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Facts of premise;

A. As to the acquisition of land ownership by M, E, and J on October 5, 1973 (see, e.g., attached Form; part of the central land among three lands located on the upper part of the drawing on the basis of a fence near the boundary (hereinafter “the center on the drawing”)), each registration of ownership transfer is completed on December 29, 1989 with respect to G large 247 square meters.

B. On June 8, 1976, she completed each registration of ownership transfer with respect to H large 355 square meters (the left-hand side of the drawings) on June 14, 1983, with respect to I large 625 square meters, on December 29, 1989, N large 84 square meters.

Consolidated M completed each registration of ownership transfer on December 30, 1987 with respect to 1,207 square meters (including the left-hand side of drawings) and 590 square meters (the right-hand side of drawings) adjacent to E’s F’s land on January 24, 197. The forest became the land first after the partition registration was completed.

(b) Newly constructed E and J buildings (i.e., its ownership);

A. (i) On June 12, 1987, the construction of a single house (hereinafter “the instant house”) on the two lands listed in paragraph (1) (hereinafter “the land was later combined with the upper part of the map”) with a construction permit granted on June 12, 1987, and the registration of ownership preservation was completed on December 16, 191 after obtaining approval for use.

dr. J shall own the property

B. On February 11, 1992, the third land written in the Do governor (hereinafter “the third land”) was combined with H large 1,064 square meters (hereinafter “the left-hand side of the drawing”) and then the art gallery was newly constructed and completed at that time (hereinafter “the art gallery of this case”). The third land was approved for use on December 22, 1994.

M (i) During the dispute between M and E, M is owned by the fence installed at the time of the new construction of E by the Seoul District Court 92Ra16341 on December 4, 1992

(a) filed a suit for removal and claim for extradition of land on the ground that the land described in Consolidated paragraph was invaded;

⑵ 위 소는 1995. 6. 29. 별지 도면 표시 7, 6, 5, 4, 15, 3, 2를 차례로 연결한 선과 유사하게 설치된 담장 중 ㈎ 부분 담장만을 철거하고 그 중간에 담장을 신설, 이를 경계 이 사건 결정에 첨부된 도면과 별지 도면을 비교하면 위...