The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime from the first investigative agency to the trial. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime and committed his mistake.

In addition, it seems that the defendant was driving in order to immediately park the vehicle in this case where the distance of the vehicle driven at the time was shorter (50m) and the course of driving was also parked.

게다가 피고인이 이 사건 범행 전까지 실형으로 처벌받은 전력은 없었던 점, 이 사건 범행 직후 이 사건 차량을 폐차하고 재범하지 않겠다는 의지를 보이고 있는 점, 공구가게 운영에 실패한 뒤 피고인의 형(兄)이 운영하는 공장에서 일을 도와주며 생계를 이어오는 등 경제적으로 어려운 형편에 있는 점, 유학 중인 아들이 방학을 맞아 한국에 들어왔다가 피고인이 구속된 이후 출국하지 못하고 아르바이트를 하면서 홀로 어렵게 생활하고 있는 점 등은 피고인에게 유리하게 참작할만한 정상들이다.

However, the crime of this case is that the defendant drives a vehicle while drunk without obtaining a driver's license in the blood alcohol concentration of 0.228%, and in light of the degree of blood alcohol concentration, it is not easy to punish the illegal act in light of the degree of blood alcohol concentration.

Moreover, on December 22, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 months of suspended execution by the Suwon District Court on December 22, 2014, and again committed the same kind of crime even though he was under suspension of execution after the lapse of 5 months from the time the judgment became final and conclusive on December 30, 2014.

In addition, it is difficult to see that the defendant is under the risk of re-offending, such as having a record of being punished once a suspended sentence and six times a fine, only before the crime of this case is committed, and other crimes are punished three times a fine.