Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 20, 2012, the Defendant settled the price of packing boxes and returned money to the victim at the “E” office operated by the victim D, which had been operated by the victim D on July 20, 2012, in accordance with the price list of the unit price sheet for the delivery of Dogs to the victim.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the facts were that the Defendant sold the stolen goods at a price lower than the unit price table, and that the sales amount was first appropriated for the packing price to be paid by the Defendant.

The Defendant, as seen above, was delivered to the injured party a total sum of KRW 2,553,300 from the market value around July 20, 2012 by the injured party, by deceptioning the injured party, and was delivered to the injured party a total of KRW 7,595,00 in the market value around September 9, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the parts concerning D confrontations);

1. Part concerning D's statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written confirmation of the results of electronic financial transfer, text messages, telephone call details, unit price table, settlement details, transaction statement, account transaction details (the defendant and his/her defense counsel, who received a delivery from the injured party in lieu of packing money payment, in lieu of packing money payment;

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, the fact that the defendant deceivings the victim as in the facts charged and received the delivery of the victim himself can be fully acknowledged.

1. The injured party has delivered his own intention to the Defendant and continuously confirmed whether to sell it.

The defendant did not sell the victim's self-recoveration.

The defective victim demanded the return of his own intention.

② The Defendant sold the victim at a price lower than the unit price set by the victim at his/her own discretion without returning the victim himself/herself.

The victims shall be compelled to the defendant with the knowledge of this fact last.