logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.07 2016나8602
임대료등
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance, including a claim added, expanded, and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

Reasons

1. In full view of the purport of the argument as a result of the fact-finding on the D Building Management Office of this Court, the Plaintiff leased approximately 200 square meters of the building stated in the purport of the claim to the Defendant around April 30, 2014 to KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 2750,00 (including KRW 3.3 million from October 30, 200, value-added tax, and management fee separate). The Plaintiff’s notification of the termination of the lease contract to the Defendant on May 6, 2015 or the delivery of the original copy of the instant payment order to KRW 205,000,000, KRW 3050,000, KRW 305,000, KRW 406, KRW 305,000, KRW 305,000, KRW 405,000,000, KRW 165,000,000,000.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above facts finding as to a claim for monetary payment, barring any special circumstance to the Plaintiff, the Defendant is clearly recorded on July 4, 2015, as follows: (a) KRW 34,844,440, deducting KRW 30,000 from the amount in arrears or the Plaintiff paid instead of the Plaintiff ( KRW 35,470,000, KRW 16,000,000, KRW 421,040, KRW 8,453,400 - Deposit KRW 30,00,000) and the date following the delivery of the original copy of the instant payment order.

arrow