1. The gift contract concluded on August 2, 2013 between the Defendant and B is KRW 9,50,030.

1. Basic facts

A. B’s credit claim 1) was used by the Plaintiff on August 4, 1993 with the credit card from the Plaintiff, and the credit card payment began in arrears from June 201. On November 28, 2011, B was adjusted by the Credit Counseling and Recovery Service on and after November 28, 201, and thereafter, B did not properly perform its credit recovery support pursuant to the above Credit Counseling and Recovery Service’s credit recovery support plan, and accordingly, the credit recovery support was invalidated on and around June 3, 2016.

3) As of April 18, 2017, B’s credit card payment obligation against the Plaintiff remains KRW 9,50,030,000 in the aggregate of the principal amount of KRW 7,264,893, interest KRW 367,960, delay damages KRW 1,867,177, as of April 18, 2017. B’s property disposal act of KRW 9,500,030 in the attached list (hereinafter “instant real property”) to the Defendant, one of his wife as of August 2, 2013.

(2) The gift contract of this case (hereinafter referred to as “instant donation contract”) shall be

(C) On August 2, 2015, the registration of ownership transfer was completed with respect to the instant real estate in the name of the Defendant. At the time of the instant donation agreement, B, at the time of the instant donation agreement, had a large number of debts in addition to the credit card payment obligations against the Plaintiff, and was in excess of obligations. D. A. The agreement between B and the Defendant was confirmed by agreement with the Gwangju Family Court No. 2016No. 397, and the Defendant completed the divorce report on March 21, 2016. E. At the time of the instant donation agreement for cancellation of collateral security, the obligor, the maximum debt amount of claims 48,00,000, Gwangju Agricultural Cooperative (hereinafter “instant collateral security”).

(B) Although this was established, the mortgage of this case was cancelled on August 5, 2013 due to termination. [The facts that there was no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap's entries in Gap's 1 through 4, 6 through 10, 13, 14, and Eul's evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination

A. According to the facts of recognition of the existence of preserved claims, the Plaintiff entered into the instant gift contract with B at the time of August 2, 2013.