logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.07.04 2018가단3092
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

As the cause of the instant claim, around April 15, 2017, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase real estate stated in the purport of the claim from KRW 200 million, and paid KRW 100 million in total the down payment and the intermediate payment on the same day. As such, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff would cancel the said sales contract on the ground that the purchase price is KRW 350 million on the ground that the Plaintiff did not pay the remainder to the Plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in each statement of evidence Nos. 2, 2, 2, and 6 through 13 (including partial heading numbers), the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant to sell and purchase the real estate price of KRW 3.5 million on April 15, 2017, and paid KRW 100 million on the same day as the down payment and the intermediate payment, and paid KRW 2.50 million on July 30, 2017. The Defendant prepared all documents necessary for filing an application for ownership transfer registration and notified the Plaintiff of the receipt and notified him of the receipt on April 26, 2018, and notified him of the remainder to the Plaintiff on May 8, 2018, the Plaintiff did not pay the remainder to the Plaintiff on the ground that the above content-certified mail was sent to the effect that the remainder would be automatically cancelled on May 27, 2018, and that the Plaintiff did not pay the remainder to the Plaintiff on July 27, 2018.

I would like to say.

Therefore, without examining the plaintiff's claim on the premise that the pre-sale agreement is valid, it is not reasonable to examine the plaintiff's claim.

arrow