The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant has not threatened the victim to a saw on December 3, 2011.

2. The victim stated consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court below that he threatened the victim's face with 50 cm in length from the defendant's face. Although the victim did not find a saw at the scene, it is consistent with the victim's credibility in the victim's statement in light of the shape of saw, "the form where a saw is increased at the end, the day part is not melted, and the knish knish is specifically described (see Investigation Records No. 89), the knish knish's hand (see Investigation Records No. 89). According to the copy of the 112 reported statement, it appears that the victim reported the defendant to the police and made a statement that the victim threatened the defendant as a knish. Considering the victim's age, it is difficult to see that the victim sawd the knish at an imminent crime scene, and there is no reasonable reason to deem otherwise.

Therefore, it is justifiable that the court below found the defendant guilty of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) against the defendant by believing the victim's statement.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.